Two measures of core inflation in the U.S. economy will decelerate in 2007 and hold nearly steady over the following two years, according to 49 forecasters surveyed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Measured on a fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter basis, core CPI inflation will fall to 2.3 percent this year and hold steady at that rate in 2008 and 2009. An alternative measure of core inflation, the rate of change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), is also expected to decelerate, to 2.0 percent, in 2007 before rising to 2.1 percent in 2009. Core inflation measures the rate of change in a price index that excludes the prices of food and energy. This is the first Survey of Professional Forecasters to report projections for core inflation.
This survey also incorporates, for the first time, projections for inflation in the headline PCE price index. Like the headline CPI, which has been included in the survey since 1981, this index incorporates food and energy prices. The forecasters see headline PCE inflation averaging 2.1 percent this year before falling to 2.0 percent in 2008 and 2009. A difference in the outlook for inflation in a headline price index and the corresponding core price index reflects the influence of recent past or expected future changes in the prices of food and energy. The table below summarizes the current outlook for inflation and shows little difference between the headline and core forecasts in 2008 and 2009. On an annual basis, only the projection for core PCE inflation shows a hint of acceleration, with the projection rising from 2.0 percent in 2008 to just 2.1 percent in 2009. Notably, the forecasters have trimmed their forecasts for headline CPI inflation in this survey. Previously, they thought this measure would average 2.6 percent in 2007 and 2.5 percent in 2008.
Over the next five years, they expect headline CPI inflation to average 2.40 percent (annual rate). The forecasters peg CPI inflation over the next 10 years at an annual rate of 2.35 percent, down from the rate of 2.50 percent they reported in the last survey. Readers of this survey know that this is a surprising revision because the forecasters have been projecting 10-year annual average inflation of 2.50 percent since 1998. Using the responses of each forecaster available on our web page, we conducted an investigation of the revision by comparing the responses of this survey to those of the last one. There were 38 forecasters who participated in both surveys. Of these 38, seven raised their estimates in this survey, but 16 cut their estimates. The mean and median amounts by which the seven raised their estimates were 0.21 and 0.10 percentage point, respectively. The mean and median amounts by which the 16 lowered their estimates were 0.17 and 0.10 percentage point, respectively. When we recomputed the median estimate for each survey, using only the 38 responses of those who participated in both surveys, we found a long-run projection of 2.50 percent in the survey of 2006 Q4, the same estimate we reported last quarter for the full sample, and 2.40 percent in this survey, very close to the median estimate of 2.35 percent in this survey’s full sample. We conclude that changing views on the long-run inflation outlook among those participants who submitted projections in both surveys accounts for some of the downward revision to the full-sample median estimates. Notably, eight forecasters participated in this survey who did not also participate in the previous one. The median estimate of these eight forecasters is 2.05 percent. This suggests that a changing composition of the panel of forecasters over the last two surveys also contributes to the downward revision to the consensus long-term CPI inflation outlook.
Headline PCE inflation is expected to average 2.10 percent over the next five years. Ten-year average PCE inflation will be 2.00 percent.
The current survey also marks the beginning of two new questions on probability ranges. We now ask the forecasters to provide their estimates of the chance that fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter core CPI and PCE inflation will fall into each of 10 different ranges in the each of the next two years. This helps analysts to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the forecasters’ annual estimates of core inflation, discussed above. For core PCE inflation, the forecasters think there is a 38 percent chance inflation will be between 2.0 and 2.4 percent in 2007. There is also a substantial chance, nearly 35 percent, inflation will average between 1.5 percent and 1.9 percent.
The forecasters have raised their estimates for real GDP growth this year. On a year-over-year basis, real GDP is seen growing 2.8 percent this year, up from the forecasters’ previous estimate of 2.6 percent. A slightly stronger labor market will accompany the outlook for growth. Nonfarm payroll employment will increase at a rate of 135,000 jobs per month in 2007, up slightly from 119,000 previously, while the unemployment rate will average 4.7 percent, down from 4.8 percent.
The forecasters see real GDP growing 3.0 percent in 2008 and the unemployment rate rising to 4.8 percent.
In first-quarter surveys, the forecasters provide their long-run projections for an expanded set of variables, including growth in output and productivity, as well as returns on financial assets. Over the next 10 years, the forecasters now think real GDP will grow at an annual rate of 3.00 percent, down from their previous estimate of 3.20 percent. Labor productivity is seen growing 2.20 percent at an annual rate over the same period, down from 2.44 percent. The forecasters have raised their estimate of the returns to stocks and Treasury bills, to 7.50 percent and 4.50 percent, respectively, but they continue to think 10-year Treasury bonds will return 5.00 percent.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia thanks the following forecasters for their participation in recent surveys:
Scott Anderson, Wells Fargo and Company; Robert J. Barbera, ITG Inc.; David W. Berson, Fannie Mae; Joseph Carson, Alliance Capital Management; Gary Ciminero, CFA, Rhode Island House Policy Office; Richard DeKaser, National City Corporation; Rajeev Dhawan, Georgia State University; Doug Duncan, Mortgage Bankers Association; Michael R. Englund, Action Economics, LLC; Gerard F. Fuda, Independent Economist; Stephen Gallagher, Societe Generale; James Glassman, JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Global Insight; Keith Hembre, First American Funds; David Huether, National Association of Manufacturers; William B. Hummer, Wayne Hummer Investments; Saul Hymans, Joan Crary, and Janet Wolfe, RSQE, The University of Michigan; Fred Joutz, Benchmark Forecasts and Research Program on Forecasting, George Washington University; Kurt Karl, Swiss Re; Dr. Irwin Kellner, Hofstra University/MarketWatch/North Fork Bank; Thomas Lam, UOB Group; L. Douglas Lee, Economics from Washington; Mickey D. Levy, Bank of America; Joseph Liro, Stone & McCarthy Research Associates; John Lonski, Moody’s Investors Service; Dean Maki, Barclays Capital; Drew Matus, Lehman Brothers; Edward F. McKelvey, Goldman Sachs; Jim Meil, Eaton Corporation; Anthony Metz, Pareto Optimal Economics; Michael Moran, Daiwa Securities America; Joel L. Naroff, Naroff Economic Advisors; Mark Nielson, Ph.D., MacroEcon Global Advisors; Michael P. Niemira, International Council of Shopping Centers; Martin A. Regalia, U.S. Chamber of Commerce; David Resler, Nomura Securities International, Inc.; David Rosenberg, Merrill Lynch; John Ryding, Bear, Stearns, and Company, Inc.; David F. Seiders, National Association of Home Builders; Xiaobing Shuai, Ph.D., Chmura Economics & Analytics; Allen Sinai, Decision Economics, Inc; Tara M. Sinclair, Research Program on Forecasting, George Washington University; Sean M. Snaith, Ph.D., University of Central Florida; Constantine G. Soras, Ph.D., Verizon Communications; Neal Soss, Credit Suisse; Stephen Stanley, RBS Greenwich Capital; Susan M. Sterne, Economic Analysis Associates, Inc.; Thomas Kevin Swift, American Chemistry Council; David Teolis, General Motors Corporation; Lea Tyler, Oxford Economics USA, Inc.; Albert M. Wojnilower; Richard Yamarone, Argus Research Group; Mark Zandi, Economy.com; Ellen Beeson Zentner, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.
This is a partial list of participants. We also thank those who wish to remain anonymous.
The Philadelphia Fed's Survey of Professional Forecasters was formerly conducted by the American Statistical Association (ASA) and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and was known as the ASA/NBER survey. The survey, which began in 1968, is conducted each quarter. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, in cooperation with the NBER, assumed responsibility for the survey in June 1990.
Return to the main page for the Survey of Professional Forecasters.